Showing posts with label Power Rankings. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Power Rankings. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 22, 2008

Article of the day

I generally try to feature an article each day from another blog. Usually they're from Penn State or Big Ten blogs, sometimes from other sites. Please check out the author's Web site. I always supply the link in the introduction.

Yet again, Stewart Mandel has blessed us with his college football wisdom. He posted his very early 2008 top 25 power rankings. I'm not going to post the whole list here, as it's way to long. So, let's just say Penn State is about where it should be ranked.

More below the fold...

Wednesday, January 9, 2008

Straight from Stewart Mandel's cave: Pitt in the top-10?!

Yes, a new season is beginning, and SI.com's resident overlord of college football has bestowed his wisdom onto us once again. In his early preseason top-10, he is not that far off:

Georgia, Ohio State, Oklahoma, USC, Missouri, West Virginia, Florida, Kansas, LSU and Wisconsin.
They all have good chances to reach or remain in the top-10 come August. I have no beef with Mandel on that. But, then take a look at his teams on the cusp. Remember, this is the TOP-10 we're talking about:
Auburn, Clemson, Illinois, Texas Tech and Pittsburgh.
Yes, you read that correctly, PITTSBURGH. My oh my how the world changes. Not too long ago, Penn State was mired in the worst stretch of football in its history, while Pitt was playing in the Fiesta Bowl. Then the tables turned, with the Nittany Lions roaring towards an Orange Bowl victory, while Pitt was struggling to win five games. Now, things are finally evening out. Sure, Pitt is on the rise with guys like Pat Bostick and LeSean McCoy, but are they really a top-10 possibility? Are they, in the warped mind of Mandel, better than Penn State right now? Let's find out, shall we? (Try opening the stats in a new window for size's sake) Probably the most telling stat is the number of returning starters on both teams. Had there been fewer starters coming back, most of the statistics would have been useless; if a team is senior-laden, the following season is usually very different, statistically. But in this case, both squads return key players on both sides of the ball, which means each team should improve next season.

Penn State's defense was a bit of a worry going into 2007, but shaped up to be very, very good, especially on the young defensive line. 2008 should see increased quarterback sacks, which is scary enough. Most of the Lion's secondary will be seniors. The last time there were four seniors in the back field, Penn State went 11-1. On offense, all five offensive linemen return, and all three senior wide recievers.

Pittsburgh is the epitome of a young, talented team. Bursting with raw ability, the Panthers lack something many top-25 teams have, experience. While the defense will be stout once again, it wasn't all-world in 2007. Some of the losses on each level of the defense could adversely affect it's ability to clamp down on opponents in crunch time. On offense, there's possibly no more exciting freshman east of Ohio than LeSean McCoy. Ripping through defenses for almost 1,400 yards is no accident. But Bostick, as improved as he will be, could be this offense's Achilles' Heel.

Pittsburg is not close to a top-10 team, in 2008. Maybe in 2009, and definately in 2010, if McCoy stays. But not now. Penn State should start the season somewhere in the top-20. Granted, that's what this team deserves after choking away three games in 2007. But there is no way, when including teams like Pitt, Clemson and Texas Tech, that Penn State shouldn't be on the short list of possible top-10'ers. But this is the fun of the off season. The worst part, is that we have another seven and a half months to go until football kicks in again. I guess watching overpaid NFL babies complaining they don't get the ball enough, will have to sufice for now.

More below the fold...

Tuesday, January 8, 2008

Pat Forde: (BCS) Ambulance Chaser

I'm not sure if he was super busy celebrating with his SEC lovers, or if he was completely plastered when he wrote it; ESPN's very own Pat Forde managed to write an article about the BCS Championship Game losers, Ohio State, that had no coherence, no journalistic restraint, and definately no bipartisan view of college football whatsoever. I know, that's his job--create Web site hits and (ESPN) talk show banter. But this article went way over the line between educated opinion and drunken redneck rant.

"Because next year's BCS National Championship Game will be played in Miami, and the Ohio State Buckeyes aren't invited. Especially if the Southeastern Conference champion is invited."
Gee, thanks Pat, you've already managed to taint next season's (mythical) national champion. Tell you what, let's just say, for one season, the Big Ten has to play in the FCS. Then, if you feel like it, you can "let" the Big Ten back into the tree house. In fact, let's just go all out and say, "Until further notice, the SEC champion will be proactively given each and every national title, regardless of record or bowl win. Likewise, all past SEC champions will be retroactively awarded each and every national title ever given in the history of college football." Oh, but I almost forgot, "The Big Ten conference champion, until further notice, will have to go sit in the corner until they learn they suck."
Let's get back to the point. I will now quote Pat's article, and follow each excerpt with actual facts which completely blow up Pat's feeble attempt at a point.
"Nobody wants to see it a third time. Give Ohio State credit for consistently being very good -- but until Jim Tressel's team proves it can step up to the highest level of competition and actually stay on the field with an SEC opponent, stay away.
When the program's bowl record is 0-9 against the SEC, the evidence is overwhelming."
Pat, if the highest level of competition is the SEC, then why aren't they their own super-mega-football bowl subdivision? In case you didn't realize, James Laurinaitis and Chris Wells weren't on John Cooper's squad that lost to South Carolina, or Earl Bruce's teams in the '80s. So all but last season's loss to Florida are irrelevant. Go look at the Big Ten's overall record versus the SEC. You're probably too lazy to look it up, so it's: But LSU plays in the absolute toughest conference in the nation.
"Been there, overcome that -- three times, in fact. They were down 10 against Florida and Auburn and Alabama. All SEC opponents, not coincidentally."
Florida lost to Michigan, Auburn lost to South Florida, and Alabama--drum roll please--lost to SunBelt powerhouse LOUISIANA-MONROE. Oh yeah, Florida lost in Orlando, Auburn lost in Auburn, and Alabama lost in Tuscaloosa. Louisiana-Monroe lost to 2-10 North Texas.
"The Big Ten, by contrast, has been the baby's crib. Ohio State has coasted through that league 15-1 the past two seasons, only to collapse in the face of an SEC champ with a lower BCS standing and a worse record."
Just who gives the SEC champ that lower BCS standing? Did the entire Ohio State team get to vote LSU below them? Last I checked, it was the writers and coaches voting LSU lower than Ohio State. Last I checked, Ohio State never demanded they belonged in the title game. Last I checked, if LSU didn't sustain so many key injuries, they would have been No. 1 all season long and undefeated. And last I checked, LSU was ranked No. 2 in the preseason, and Ohio State was No. 10. So are you really that surprised that LSU won? You shouldn't be. Or are you acting surprised for ratings and readership?
I should know better. I should expect this from a writer like Pat, though.
"The Buckeyes have achieved just enough the past two seasons to rise to a level where they're incompetent."
Please, Ohio State's rise was only possible with the clatter of the sports writers' keyboards and the ranting into the microphones. The media has no one to blame for this second consecutive BCS bomb, but themselves. This time, it was Pat Forde chasing after the ambulance, on its way to clean up after another BCS train wreck. He saw the opportunity to pounce on a situation, offering an opinion which is in almost direct contradiction of what he had said prior to the game. From his pre-bowl Forde-Yard-Dash:
"The Buckeyes lead the nation in total D, while the Tigers are third. LSU has had time to heal a lot of battered bodies, perhaps most importantly that of defensive tackle Glenn Dorsey, who has been dragging himself through the last half of the season on a bad leg. His matchup against star Buckeyes tackles Kirk Barton and Alex Boone will make the trenches well worth watching. But it's on the perimeter where LSU should have the edge with a similar speed advantage to what Florida enjoyed last year. Hard to see Ohio State QB Todd Boeckman (four interceptions, zero touchdowns his last two games) making enough plays to beat LSU.

Dash pick: LSU 27, Ohio State 14."
Pat seemed pretty damn sure LSU would win by a large margin. So what's so surprising to him? If he knew LSU would win, then fine. But don't come out a day later and then go on a tangent saying how horrid the Buckeyes and the Big Ten are--a day later, when Pat could smuggly compose his article knowing the game's final score. There was not one hint of "I told you so" in the article, something you would come to expect from a person who believes in what they write. But after all, it's all Ohio State's fault. The Buckeyes should have told the BCS, "No, I think we'll pass this season. We want to go to the Rose Bowl instead." Shame on you Ohio State. Shame on you Jim Tressel. How dare you, wanting to compete for a national title. The voters and the coaches begged you, pleaded that you don't bully them into voting "Ohio State: No. 1." Pat Forde is a leader, a man among boys when it comes to chosing who should play in the national championship, and we should all bow down to him. For it is he who should be the sole dictator of college football, and no petty minion should dare question his word, especially if that word says the Big Ten sucks balls.
"And he should know not to bring that weak Big Ten stuff back to the BCS National Championship Game again next year."
Well, I guess Ohio State AD Gene Smith has no choice. The Buckeyes should just drop their football program. They don't deserve to play the game. Ohio State, you can just take your toys and go home! You're not my friend anymore, and you can't come to my birthday party, either!

More below the fold...

Tuesday, November 6, 2007

Stewart Mandel's lack of logic strikes again



Is it just me, or does SI.com columnist Stewart Mandel consistently represent everything that's wrong with the current college football polling system? In his power rankings this week, he listed Illinois (27) ahead of PSU (28). Now, I understand that the Illini beat PSU head-to-head, but look at where the teams were ranked the week before: Illinois 32, PSU 28. The Nittany Lions didn't move an inch in Mandel's rankings after beating a 7-2 Purdue team, while Illinois jumped up five spots following a beatdown of 1-7 Minnesota. Make sense to you? Me neither.

In fact, Mandel proved my point for me, saying "The Illini -- whom Oregon fans, no doubt, are praying can knock off top-ranked Ohio State on Saturday -- head into Columbus with what on the surface appears reasonable amount of momentum. Ron Zook's crew gained 655 total yards on Saturday in a 44-17 rout of Minnesota. Rashard Mendenhall ran for 201 yards, and Juice Williams ran for 133, but those stats don't mean all that much. The Gophers' run defense is ranked 115th in the country; the Buckeyes' is ranked third. The Ducks faithful would be better off pinning their hopes on Michigan."

Thank you Stewie. Is it such an accomplishment to beat a team that lost to Florida Atlantic and North Dakota State? Apparently, it is to Mandel. I would hope Illinois rolled up that many yards and points on the worst team in the conference (and probably other conferences, too). But apparently for PSU, holding one of the best Big Ten offenses to ZERO touchdowns isn't that impressive to him.

Illinois leapfrogs PSU for beating a horrible, one-win team, while PSU remains stagnant for beating a quality, bowl-bound opponent. And this guy gets a vote each week?

More below the fold...

Big Ten Bloggers Feed

Zombie Nation Blog Roll

Blurbs galore...

"Heavy on the analysis and discussion, this meaty blog craves brains because they use 'em when discussing their football. Good reading..." - Sporting News Today, 11/03/08

"Zombie Nation is here..." - SI on Campus, 06/13/08

"One of the prominent Penn State Blogs..." - SpartyMSU, 6/22/09

Troy Nunes is an Absolute Magician, 6/22/09

"Zombie Nation, a venerable Penn State blog..." - Maize & Blue Nation, 02/10/09

"...We prefer the sly wit and banter from Zombie Nation." - The Enlightened Spartan, 11/21/08

"Zombie Nation gets an "A"..." - Lake the Posts, 09/18/08

"...Zombie Nation, a great Penn State football blog." - Orange::44, 09/12/08

"Zombie Nation gets points for trying." - MaizeNBrew, 09/12/08

"If you are looking for a reasoned response, visit ZN..." - There is No Name on my Jersey, 09/04/08

  © Templates by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008 / Edited for Zombie Nation

Back to TOP